Will Joe Biden Gift Us a Nuclear Winter by Granting Ukraine Permission to Long-Range Strike Russia?

The Biden administration’s apocalyptic farewell gift to the American people was to ramp up hostilities in Ukraine to “Trump-proof” American aid to that country and ensure that the incoming administration is not able to come to a negotiation with Russia. Yes, President Joe Biden (but really the people behind him) is attempting to sabotage any possibility for peace so that he can secure his place in history as a war hero who saved Ukraine, keep the profits to the military-industrial complex continuing to flow, and potentially have justification to suspend the United States Constitution and hand power over to the loser of the 2024 presidential election, Vice President Kamala Harris, in an undemocratic display of power. Historians may debate about when Cold War II (not yet acknowledged, but it should be) transitioned into World War III, but the fact of the matter is that the Democratic Party is willing to risk and sacrifice American lives to nuclear blasts and radiation because it did not get the results that it wanted in the election. It, along with its corporate media and deep state allies, thought that Harris would easily swoop into the presidency and be able to gradually move us into World War III, but instead, the hot war with Russia is being expedited in order to get the conflict escalated before inauguration day. It is feared that Donald Trump would potentially cut off aid to Ukraine and become a roadblock to the blood-for-profit scheme that the Biden administration has enabled in Europe.

The largest piece to this catastrophic puzzle is that the Biden administration has given the “green light” to Ukraine to use Lockheed Martin-made MGM-140 Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) to hit targets deep into Russian territory (the range is about 190 miles, and Ukraine borders Russia). Right after this, Ukraine fired eight such missiles into Russia’s Bryansk Oblast (which borders the war-torn Kursk Oblast), and seemingly two of these were intercepted by the Russian military. Initially, it had been reported that there were six missiles, and Russia had eliminated five of them, with one reaching a military target and starting a fire in a facility. Regardless of which account is true, the fact that this is a major escalation in the Russo-Ukrainian War and could ignite into something much larger remains. Following the ATACMS barrage, Dictator Volodymyr Zelensky (he has usurped power and suspended elections until after the war) launched ten British-manufactured Storm Shadow cruise missiles into Kursk Oblast, as the United Kingdom puppet of the American Empire followed President Biden’s lead in authorizing long-range strikes into Russian territory.   

This comes after the Department of State finally admitted that North Korean soldiers are engaging with Russian troops to repel Ukrainians from the Kursk Oblast, and why North Korea assisting Russia in the war effort would be justification to escalate tensions is beyond any rational approach to geopolitics. In fact, the rumor circulating around is that Russia is looking to regain lost territory in order to prevent Ukraine from having this as a bargaining chip when Trump assumes the presidency and negotiates a deal, and the Biden administration is attempting to prevent Russia from retaking its land and sabotaging the prospects of a peace deal (Ukraine took roughly 1,000 square kilometers of Russia, compared to the 20% of the entire country of Ukraine that Russia seized). This gesture is real kind and noble of the sore losers in the Democratic Party.

Why would a policy shift regarding the ATACMS make a difference this time around? I mean, the Biden administration previously drew lines in the sand to prevent the American transfer of Patriot missiles, Abrams tanks, and F-16 fighter jets, and yet, it reneged on all of those polices. That is a good question, and the answer lies with not so much what the United States government is doing and more on how it is being perceived by Russia. We can disregard Russia’s views and feelings on these issues and claim that the nation is being reckless and enacting detrimental polices all we want, but at the end of the day, if you refuse to understand the perspective of your enemy, you will always fail to negotiate a peaceful solution to any problem (even if peace is not the goal, not understanding your enemy will mean failure on the battlefield as well).

For starters, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov suggested that Ukrainians are not capable of operating the ATACMS by themselves and that the system requires American troops on the ground to operate, and if this is true, it would mean that Americans are actively and directly (not indirectly through proxies) firing missiles at Russia (it has been known that there are American troops on the ground in Ukraine and that United States intelligence is assisting Ukraine in targeting the Russian military, but this would be on another level completely). From this perspective, the Russians have taken this as a sign that the United States wants a hot war with Russia, and as a result, it will prepare accordingly.

In addition to Russia’s announcement that the West undoubtedly wants war with it, Russian President Vladimir Putin updated his nuclear doctrine to allow the utilization of nuclear weapons against any nation that allies itself with another country (nuclear or non-nuclear) that directly attacks Russian territory. In other words, Russia is considering retaliating against the United States’, Europe’s, and Ukraine’s joint attacks on its soil and using nuclear missiles or bombs to do it. We are at a very dangerous point in time, and if the Biden administration gets its way and starts World War III before Trump assumes the presidency, we may be in for some very dark days ahead. Now, to be fair, Russia has unjustifiably invaded Ukraine and is constantly bombing territory in that country (even if it was provoked by the Obama and Biden administrations and plagued by non-stop North Atlantic Treaty Organization, or NATO, expansion), but again, if you do not understand the perspective of your enemy, catastrophic consequences may follow (contrary to the popular belief by left-wing commentators, it is not pro-Russia to wish for peace and diplomacy and want an end to this conflict).

A hot war with Russia, which would likely lead to the joining in by China and Iran (North Korea is already involved), is not inevitable, but it is probable. What makes it even more serious is the fact that Russia is internally preparing for the exchange of nuclear missiles by building a massive number of radiation-resistant bomb shelters that can hold up to fifty-four people each, and Sweden and Finland (NATO’s two newest members) are advising their citizens to stockpile supplies and prepare for war with Russia. The Biden administration is pushing for this war and is willing to risk lives for the sake of pride and profit, and yet, Americans are not given nuclear warnings, nor is the United States government building bomb shelters to protect them from a war that it started. American citizens are just expendable tools to keep the corporate gears turning in the moments that they are needed, but you can guarantee that the elites and politically-connected members of society will be able to safely retreat to their underground sanctuaries while the rest of us blow up and suffer from radiation sickness.

The Biden administration is seemingly pushing an evil agenda unlike anything that we have seen so far. The only thing we can hope for is that Putin will show restraint, knowing that in a few months he will be dealing with a less hostile group of oligarchs in the White House (though the deep state will likely continue to instigate), and it is not a good place to be in when Americans have to rely on a rival foreign leader to not fall for the trap set by their own government.

Thank you for reading, and please check out my book, The Global Bully, and website.