The January 6th Narrative Is Being Dismantled Piece by Piece, But Most Still Do Not Care
As many know by now, the events on January 6, 2021 have been taken way out of proportion in order for the Democratic Party to push a narrative and target its political opponents, and the most ardent members of the Trump-hating cult will continue to believe what they were initially told, despite more and more evidence being released to the contrary. Increasingly, we learn that what really happened was a peaceful protest where some of the participants were manipulated or provoked into getting out of hand and committing violence, and then, police allowed some of the protesters to enter the Capitol and walk around without hindrance. It was the largest known entrapment scheme in American history.
As I have said previously, with having law enforcement experience, I can tell you that the police would only let the protesters in the building and wander around unless they had strict orders to do so. Otherwise, the objective would be to protect the building and the members of Congress at all costs, and if you were to defy such orders, there would be severe consequences. While some will attribute this (without evidence) to President Donald Trump having control of the United States Capitol Police (USCP) and ordering them to stand down and follow his white supremacist and fascist takeover of the country, fear of the consequences alone would have made most of the police follow their mandates of protecting Congress; and from the footage that we now have access to, it appears that the police outside of the building were firing upon the crowds with rubber bullets and other non-lethal munitions.
Thanks for reading Craig’s Newsletter! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.
If Trump were ordering the police to stand down in some grand conspiracy, they were not listening to him at that moment, but then, when the protesters entered the Capitol, they then suddenly stood down and paid attention to his orders. That does not make any sense from a Trump-controlling-the-police perspective, but if you look at the events from the viewpoint of it being an entrapment scheme with elements of false flag operations in order to push a narrative, it makes quite a lot of sense. Plus, Trump was the commander-in-chief of the United States, so if he were really attempting a coup, he could have directed the military to take control of the Capitol and started the process of consolidating power, but he did no such thing. In fact, he even asked the protesters to “go home now.” Trying to push the January 6th coup narrative is pathetic.
However, convincing Americans that the incident was an insurrection is so important to the establishment that the federal government will even target journalists who were there that day to report the truth of what happened. For revealing information about how USCP had no justification for shooting and killing Ashli Babbit; journalist Tayler Hansen appears to have been illegally spied on by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), stalked by forty-eight air marshals (over the course of sixteen flights), and branded as a "domestic terrorist." To this day, he has not been charged with trespassing, interrupting an official congressional session, or any terrorist or conspiracy charges, so the purpose seems to be intimidation and surveillance of journalists. Many Americans still believe that the United States is a free country that respects freedom of speech and press and the ability to not be search and seized without a warrant, but in reality, if you oppose the narrative and reveal inconvenient truths about government misconduct, you may find yourself on a terrorist watch list (or fleeing the country to seek asylum elsewhere).
What did Hansen disclose that was such a threat to the government and the narrative being pushed? Besides heart attacks, suicide, and drug overdoses following the incident, Ashli Babbit was the only true casualty of January 6th; and even her story is purposely misconstrued. She has been painted as a Trump-supporting radical who deserved to be shot by police for being a domestic terrorist, but yet, according to Hansen’s live reporting (available to see for yourself), Babbit not only offered the police water, but she was actually attempting to physically stop protesters from breaking windows and entering the building. The unarmed woman was then unjustifiably and violently killed by police without even a verbal warning given, and not only were the police not held accountable for murder (like was the case with George Floyd), but there is allegedly an active campaign to protect those officers from prosecution (they were even promoted, and some of the video footage from that section of the building was conveniently wiped out). Of course, it was necessary to paint the picture of Babbit as a violent insurrectionist who needed to be murdered (the Left is fine with police brutality against their political enemies but get enraged when it is used against certain others, which is a weird cherry-picking phenomenon). Only a tyrannical government covers up the truth and punishes those who reveal it.
If the government targeting a journalist for spreading information running contrary to the accepted narrative were not enough, it has now been uncovered that the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) was providing special resources to financial institutions so that they could flag purchases of firearms and Bibles (yes, purchasing a Bible or buying a gun at Dick’s Sporting Goods or Bass Pro Shop could get you suspected of being a terrorist) and report back to the Department of Treasury for further terrorist or criminal investigations (any transaction mentioning “Trump” or “MAGA” would also be flagged). Why were these investigations necessary, you may ask? Well, protesters on January 6th may have been inclined to purchase these types of items, so that gives the government justification to do general searches of the population’s transactions, of course.
Privacy is a thing of the past, and the First, Second, and Fourth Amendments are just words on paper with no real-world application in our modern era. Many will argue that governments need to evolve and that our rights are not absolute, and therefore, privacy violations may be necessary to keep the population safe from those pesky terrorists. House Representative Jim Jordan from Ohio is investigating this un-American surveillance activity committed by the Biden administration against conservatives and the general population at large, but I wonder if progressives would ignore this violation of our rights if a conservative administration were to target purchases of items that they hold dear. Is that what it would really take for them to get outraged by this? Plus, there is really no indication that the government’s retail spying operation has ceased, so we should be vigilant.
After three years of sophisticated surveillance efforts and supposed video footage of a suspect, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has still yet to find information on who left the pipe bombs outside of both the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and Republican National Committee (RNC) headquarters. To complicate matters further, the FBI admitted in front of the House of Representatives that in an “unusual circumstance,” the “key” data needed to pinpoint who the culprit is happened to be corrupted by the cellphone provider. So, basically, one of the most advanced surveillance entities on the planet was not able to identify the perpetrator because the data needed coincidentally became unavailable. Since the FBI will gladly monitor innocent civilians and has the capability of sophisticated spy technology, it seems like the logical conclusions would be that the bureau does not have an interest in finding the suspect, it is providing cover for that individual (perhaps a Democratic Party operative), or the culprit was actually an FBI agent conducting a false flag operation, which could then be used to paint Trump supporters as violent insurrectionists and secure increased funds and legitimacy for anti-domestic terrorist efforts. Did the FBI and USCP collaborate to create a false flag assassination attempt of Kamala Harris to create anti-Trump sentiment in this country?
As I mentioned previously, the federal government, including the Department of Justice, falsified reports, which were then echoed by the corporate media, that Vice President-Elect Kamala Harris was at the Capitol during the events of January 6th; but in fact, she had been at the DNC building, where her Secret Service detail failed (after a full sweep was conducted) to find the alleged pipe bomb located under a park bench just feet from the building (it was supposedly planted the night before). Then, in a theater-like fashion, the USCP was able to locate the bombs and make sure that Harris was dramatically rescued from certain death. Could an FBI agent have planted the bomb after the security sweep but just before USCP searched the grounds?
All of this seemed suspicious before, but after House Representative Thomas Massie from Kentucky was able to help pressure the USCP to release additional video footage of what happened when the pipe bomb was discovered at the DNC building, it should be clear that the incident was a setup. In fact, there is now evidence that the person who found the bomb alerted the Metropolitan Police Department of the District of Columbia (MPDC) and Secret Service by casually walking over to the police vehicles and talking to multiple people, and when the police heard the news, they were indifferent and did not make an effort to quickly mitigate the situation (it was minutes before any movement was made). It is almost like the police knew that the bomb was not a threat or able to be detonated, because if it were a real concern, they would have acted immediately to prevent harm to those they were tasked with protecting (and the children who were in the area and would have been killed if the bomb had gone off). Then, a member of the USCP took a picture of the bomb, and the MPDC and USCP vehicles left the scene and allowed a “bomb-safe robot” to come on scene after several minutes to neutralize it. There was no sense of urgency whatsoever, and of course, the government and the corporate media are uninterested in answering questions on the matter or having their insurrectionist narrative destroyed.
Instead, we will continue to hear about January 6th as another Pearl Harbor or September 11th for as long as the current system exists. Until the fall of the United States government, the day will forever be seen as a threat to our democracy. Even with all of the mounting evidence revealing government corruption, entrapment, provocation, and violence, those who were misled into believing the insurrectionist narrative will likely never be open-minded to new information or change their views (perhaps some will). Their perspective is cemented and based on what they knew initially. All we can really do is try to convince those who do not have their minds already made up. January 6th was clearly not an insurrection, and until we are able to dismantle the government and corporate propaganda, the history books will be publishing fake news.
Thank you for reading, and please check out my book, The Global Bully, and website.
For additional reading on January 6th, please see the below:
Part 1 – “The Second Anniversary of January 6th: Will We Ever Know the Full Truth of the Federal Government’s Involvement?”
Part 2 – “Militarization on January 6th: An Account of Police Brutality and Excessive Force”
Part 3 – “Keep Your Eyes Closed to the Truth of January 6th: The Mainstream Push to Ignore New Evidence that Contradicts the Narrative of That Day”
Part 4 – “Unjust Prison Sentences for the January 6th Protesters Paint a Picture of the Official Narrative”
Part 5 – “Continue to Keep Your Eyes Closed to the Nuances of January 6th: Mike Johnson’s New Footage Will Not Likely Change the Official Narrative”
Thanks for reading Craig’s Newsletter! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.