2025 Started Off with Two Terrorist Bangs Full of Coincidences

So far, 2025 has started off with two terrorist attacks, both of which occurred on New Year’s Day (January 1^st). Of course, any new terrorist attack will bring about calls for taking additional security measures that threaten Americans’ civil liberties, but there are several things that do not add up in regards to a veteran convert to Islam and a white veteran who both utilized rental trucks as weapons on the same day in two different locations (we have a radical Muslim and a white Trump supporter committing acts of terror on the same day, so the liberal and conservative crowds can both have a field day with this one). Were these planned events by the government, or were they just two separate incidents full of random coincidences?

We ended the year of 2024 off with alleged assassin Luigi Mangione killing the CEO of UnitedHealthcare (a subsidiary of UnitedHealth Group), Brian Thompson. Although Americans are rightfully upset about the medical system and the excessive number of claims denials (that seemingly violate contractual agreements), murdering one person who represents that system but likely had no say in the actual day-to-day claims processes only causes the system itself to crack down and paint those who are sympathetic toward Mangione as terrorists (the problem is with the system and not the individuals within it, and if you take out one of them, you will only get another to replace him or her). Murder is not the answer, and yet, many progressive Americans, who ironically want to restrict firearms, were giddy at the prospect of a corporate executive being shot in cold blood (they want bloody revolution in the streets, but they do not want people to own guns).

Not only was Mangione charged with murder and terrorism (he clearly stated that his intent was to kill to make Americans upset about the healthcare insurance system), but a woman in Florida was arrested after she ended her phone call with the claims adjusters who denied her medical treatment by using the phrase, “Delay, Deny, Depose. You people are next.” Although she was clearly angry and was simply playing off of the most recent event without actually posing a threat to anyone (those three words were engraved on the shell casings of the bullet used by Mangione), she was arrested for uttering those words. Again, this murder only helped to cause the system to crackdown on individual speech, and now, others may be in similar hot water or become monitored for praising what Mangione did. The government will now use this violence as justification to violate free speech.

The first major news story of 2025 that Americans were exposed to was that of Army veteran and former Texas real estate businessman and information technology (IT) specialist Shamsud-Din Jabbar driving his rented electric Ford F-150 truck into a crowd of people on Bourbon Street in New Orleans. The terrorist that killed fourteen other people (the perpetrator makes fifteen) was instantly said to be a lone wolf who attached his Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) flag to the truck. Earlier in the day, Jabbar could be seen planting two improvised explosive devices (IEDs) in the French Quarter of the city, and after he used his truck to hit as many pedestrians as possible and crashed the vehicle, he was killed in a gunfight with police.

The first strange thing about this attack is that Jabbar just recently re-converted to Islam, and he only pledged allegiance to ISIS hours before the attack. Furthermore, ISIS has yet to take credit for the violence, which sort of makes it seem like this was a lone wolf situation not really connected to ISIS (he was also suffering from a divorce and financial issues). However, putting the focus on ISIS allows the government to have a scapegoat and condition the people into believing that the organization is still a threat and that Americans need to be monitored for their safety. After the fall of the Bashar al-Assad regime in Syria, the Joe Biden administration has wanted Americans to be afraid of ISIS in order to have justification for further involvement in the Middle East and to solidify the roles of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), and other agencies that could be threatened with funding and personnel cuts under the incoming Donald Trump administration; and this attack is a convenient story to sell those ideas.

What also strikes funny with this incident is the fact that instead of the FBI and local police closing off the house for evidence, as is usually the case, it allowed journalists from the New York Post to walk through Jabbar’s home to find an alleged “bomb-making station and a Quran open to a chilling passage about martyrdom.” As pointed out by comedian Tim Young, “The FBI literally seized a US Capitol LEGO set from a J6 defendant…But they left the Quran open to a passage about martyrdom next to the bomb making station sitting in the terrorists apartment … Sure, yeah, O.K …..” Since some evidence was purposely taken and some left staged for the reporter to find, it almost seems like the FBI itself had something to do with the attack, like perhaps persuading Jabbar, who was distressed in his personal life, to pledge allegiance to ISIS and commit a terrorist attack (the FBI regularly uses informants to go under cover, including in the January 6^th protests, so is it possible that one such confidential human source convinced Jabbar to commit an act of terror for the benefit of the FBI?).

Not long after the New Orleans incident, in Paradise, Nevada, the Cybertruck (produced by Elon Musk’s Tesla) bomber Matthew Livelsberger, who was apparently suffering from mental illness due to combat-related incidents in Afghanistan, allegedly rigged his vehicle with explosives (IED) and detonated it in front of the Trump International Hotel Las Vegas (Livelsberger was the only victim, but there were seven known injuries). Of course, after the fiery explosion, Livelsberger’s passport and military identification card were easily recovered from the scene of the blaze (similar to how the hijackers’ passports were magically found in the ruble after the September 11, 2001 attack). It is amazing that when there is an agenda to identify someone, everything else burns up except for the IDs. I wonder why that could be.

At the time, Livelsberger had a partner and a newborn child and was a Trump supporter, so it is uncertain what could have drove him to commit a terrorist attack in front of his preferred candidate’s hotel. There are a few possibilities, though. One is post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), like the corporate media is suggesting and wants you to believe. Though this is possible, what makes it seem less likely is the fact that Livelsberger and Jabbar (New Orleans attacker) both shared time stationed at Fort Bragg, North Carolina (now Fort Liberty) in common (in addition to both of them renting electric vehicles from the online application Turo). Is it possible that the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) had a hand in brainwashing these two veterans into attacking? Though it may seem farfetched, do not forget that MK-Ultra and other similar programs existed and still exist (in some form), and the CIA experiments on victims and may be able to control their minds and make them commit acts that they otherwise would not have done (if you think that government agencies would not do something like this, wake up).

What would bring even more legitimacy to this idea is the fact that Livelsberger was on the History Channel’s reality television show “Ultimate Soldier Challenge.” We know that the CIA has had a hand in penetrating the news and entertainment industries to condition Americans into believing its established narratives and following its agendas, so was Livelsberger a willing or unwilling participant in a CIA program? Jabbar travelled to Egypt for ten days in 2024, so is it possible that the CIA trained him there for an upcoming attack?

Keep in mind that Livelsberger supposedly shot himself in the head with a Desert Eagle handgun before the Cybertruck drove itself (the vehicle has self-driving capabilities) into the hotel, which brings up the question: why would someone commit suicide knowing that the fiery explosion would do the job? Could it be that he could no longer live with what he had planned and ended his life, or could it be that the government hacked into the vehicle and ended Livelsberger’s life (this would make sense if we can believe reports that he was sitting upright in the vehicle as it approached its destination, since someone who shot himself in the head would probably not be in the upright position by that time)?

Previously, it had been alleged that the DNA records found from the charred body did not match those of his family members, leaving some to speculate that someone had programed the truck to explode but that Livelsberger was still alive. However, police have said that they are confident that it was him, especially given the unique tattoos found on the deceased body. Still, it is possible that the government is lying about this.

The question, then, is: why would a Green Beret commit such an act? Was it really mental illness? It could have simply been an act of suicide being that Livelsberger was experienced at making explosives and “could have inflicted serious damage” if he had wanted to, but he instead decided to use an almost indestructible Cybertruck, where the external damage remained minimal. There are many motives circulating around the internet, including an alleged manifesto and letters that were accessed from two phones found in the Cybertruck (it must be a solid vehicle for ID cards and cell phones to be able to make it through explosions intact). It appears that Livelsberger had been tracking his progress in the attacks, and these letters included a message that the United States was headed down the wrong path and that Americans needed to “wake up” to the atrocities being committed by the government. Having a disgruntled veteran and Trump supporter commit an attack then gives the government justification to surveil and target conservative Americans, since they will be painted as domestic threats.

This motive also seems to line up with the manifesto that was provided to intelligence analyst Sam Shoemate to then relay to Navy Seal-turned-CIA analyst-turned-podcaster Shawn Ryan. In the podcast, it was revealed that part of the motive behind the attack was that Livelsberger was ashamed of being part of an operation to cover up war crimes committed by the United States military in the Nimruz Province of Afghanistan in 2019, and during this act of slaughter, it is estimated that hundreds of civilians were killed (the United Nations, or UN, even released a report condemning the United States’ reckless attacks against drug-processing facilities that led to confirmed civilian deaths around that timeframe). Could guilt from his culpability in these war crimes have led him to suicide, or could the government have used this guilt to trigger or entrap him into committing a heinous act?

The manifesto read on the podcast also suggested that the increase in drone activity (first in New Jersey and then other parts of the country) was related to the science fiction concept of “gravitic propulsion systems,” which Livelsberger allegedly pins on China (he said that both the United States and China exclusively have this new state-of-the-art technology). As I stated previously, the government may have been experimenting on new technology that was on display for the citizenry to see, but it seems implausible that it would allow an adversary like China to fly drones around in our airspace without doing anything, unless the United States and China were collectively working together for a common purpose (if the United States also had this same technology, clearly it would be able to challenge these Chinese drones in the sky and eliminate the threat). It is unknown whether the manifesto is legitimate (edit lines in the email suggesting that it was still in draft mode may be explained by the fact that Shoemate redacted names that he felt should not be exposed before releasing the email, but it also could indicate tampering of the content of the email), and it is possible that the intelligence analyst in Shoemate purposely released this information to the truther community with the blessing of the intelligence community and for the purpose of misleading the public (or, he could have been misled himself). Why would Shoemate go directly to the FBI with this information if that entity is an enemy of the people and was targeting the whistleblower (Livelsberger)?

The authenticity of the manifesto and letters seem to appear legitimate and also not at the same time, so it is difficult to say what one should believe about this. However, Shawn Ryan’s podcast, including with CIA analyst Sarah Adams, seems to suggest, as of late, that al Qaeda, ISIS, and other groups have been set up to illegally cross the Mexican border and commit terrorist attacks (including an Iranian missile that supposedly evaded the Biden administration’s border security team and made it into the United States). You can judge for yourself what you think about this, but to me, this sort of makes me think that these former intelligence analysts are not so former and are actively seeking to stoke fear in the American public for the purposes of legitimizing the bureaucratic institutions that Donald Trump is looking to gut. If there are more terrorist attacks, false flag or not, the CIA and FBI get to retain their power and save themselves from Trump’s plan to “drain the swamp” and reduce the size and scope of these agencies.

Although there is some truth behind the illegal border crossings meant to cause harm to Americans, the intelligence community is probably purposefully allowing this in order to have radicals ready to serve their interests domestically (the CIA can train them overseas and then let them wreak havoc throughout American cities). Meanwhile, Americans continue to be conditioned to rally around the flag in furtherance of the interests of the military-industrial complex, whether we engage in operations in or against Syria, Iraq, Iran, Russia, or China. Additionally, with an increase in terrorist attacks comes more security measures that threaten to further degrade our civil liberties (never forget the Patriot Act that was passed with bipartisan support after 9-11).

Although I cannot confirm whether or not the Las Vegas and New Orleans incidents were false flag or entrapment-related attacks or something that the Biden administration had its hand in, there are certain coincidences and strange happenings that just cannot be avoided. We must remain vigilante this year, as the deep state will do whatever it can to undermine the incoming Trump administration and continue our march toward World War III and other evil agendas. Even if we disagree on certain issues, we the people need to unite as much as possible on the areas of common ground and challenge the powers that be. Fragmentation within our movement will not help us in achieving the overall goal of freeing ourselves from the elites that seek power over our lives.

Thank you for reading, and please check out my book, The Global Bully, and website.