The Maui Wildfires:
A Perfect Storm of Coincidences or Something Sinister?
Two days after devastating wildfires blazed the Hawaiian island of Maui and destroyed one of the Kingdom of Hawaii’s former capital cities, Lahaina, a book was published showing the impacts of climate change and how these fires were caused by it. As someone who has written a book, I do not see how such a work could be written, edited, and published in the timeframe that it was, so there is something fishy going on with the Maui fires right off the bat. Even though some suggest that the book was created by Artificial Intelligence (AI), as it stands now, there would still need to be a human looking over it before the release date (Dr. Miles Stone, the supposed author, does not even seem to exist). As far as I can tell, the only way such a book could have been distributed so early is that the material was gathered and written in anticipation of the catastrophic event.
This does not necessarily prove that the Maui fires were planned, but it does show that there are experts, officials, and others who are ready to use tragedy to push climate change propaganda as quickly as events occur. The facts of the fires are still officially unknown, and yet, these experts already have the culprit. If manmade climate change was so obvious, why would they need to mislead and deceive us and orchestrate weather events to prove to us that it is a problem in need of constant conditioning? However, a book being published two days after the catastrophe and showing a date range that went into the future (August 8th through 11th, when the book was published on the 10th), is hardly the only suspicious activity that warrants investigation with the Maui fires.
Thanks for reading Craig’s Newsletter! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.
As soon as Hurricane Dora blew winds across Maui, allegedly causing the first sparks under the perfectly dry conditions, the “largest integrated emergency siren network in the world” suddenly failed, even though it had been tested regularly and on August 1st (some suggest that the Hawaiian government deliberately kept the alarms silent). How is that for a coincidence? It worked a week before the fires started, but at the moment that the residents needed it, it could not be relied upon. Then, of course, there was no power or cellphone coverage, and the people were not able to be notified of impending doom. On top of that, the water systems failed, largely due to lack of power, and firefighters were unable to quell the fires quick enough to prevent the spread.
A perfect storm of infrastructure failure, in conjunction with police blockades, put the citizens in harm’s way. One local resident recalled the incident and said that one of the policemen had “orders” to make sure that those trying to escape Front Street by car remained trapped on the road. Elsewhere, utility trucks, sometimes accompanied by police cars, were blocking other routes out of town, as crews allegedly worked on cleaning up live and downed wires; and there are first-hand accounts of the blockades. As a result of not being permitted to leave, many of the residents were forced to flee their cars on foot and jump into the ocean or find some escape route. Town officials, who were supposed to serve the public, were actually forcing people to stay near the blazes, and you have to wonder what the reason could possibly be for trapping people in place? This seems like pure evil. How could any public employees, including the police, be so careless with others’ lives? It is almost like there were powerful elites who wanted people to die in order to push some kind of agenda.
Even after the initial blockages, checkpoints were established around West Maui to prevent people and supplies from getting in and out of Lahaina (one such resident detailed the horrors that the people suffered). The police were putting people’s lives in danger and making life miserable, as residents and travelers attempted to gather belongings, medical supplies, and food to survive. Residents and response personnel were also required to show “placards” (permission slips) to enter parts of the island.
Almost as soon as the fires lit up, investors were out in force calling local residents to inquire about land sales. Yes, while people were at their lowest and dealing with escaping from burned down houses, companies were attempting to acquire as much land as possible in what appears to be an effort to displace native Hawaiians and local residents and rebuild Lahaina in the image of corporate America. There are some who reported that investors had been bidding to gain this land for years, but the residents refused to sell it. Now that the people are vulnerable, they are much more likely to acquiesce to real estate and corporate terms.
Despite Governor Josh Green pledging to prevent investors from stealing the land from residents or taking advantage of them, he seems to have his own agenda in mind. In fact, he stated that the Hawaiian government was interested in buying up the land for “workforce housing” or memorials to preserve the land for the locals. So, basically, the governor wants to turn private residences into public housing that can be more easily controlled by government.
Although this in of itself does not constitute the new concept of smart cities, which would use technology to keep residents controlled and forced to live under “sustainable” policies, it does raise some questions about whether or not the goal was to destroy Maui and rebuild it under new futuristic city planning models. The island has already been the host of the Maui Smart Grid Project (initiated in 2011), which just so happens to be owned by Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc., which is in turn controlled by BlackRock and The Vanguard Group (the country’s largest investment firms, which are majority shareholders in most Fortune 500 companies).
Hawaiian Electric may have actually been the source of the Maui fires, as it failed to turn off the power when it knew that high winds presented a fire hazard. The winds knocked down the company’s poles and wires, which likely caused the initial sparks, so it is unlikely that climate change had anything to do with the fires (even though it was being blamed without any of the facts).
Did the electric company and its investors want the island to burn? Did it allow its infrastructure to cause the most devastating fires in the state’s history? The government-granted monopoly knew for years that it was not maintaining its power lines and systems in the proper manner (perhaps if it were not so busy bowing to the pressures of BlackRock and Vanguard by investing in “green energy,” it could have fixed its own aging infrastructure and prevented disaster), and because it had no competition or incentive to alter its course, it could have been responsible for hundreds of deaths. The good news is that now lawsuits are being brought, and the company may have to pay up to $4 billion, if negligence can be proven.
We cannot know for sure what took place in early August, but Maui was the host of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2023, of which the concept of smart cities was one of the topics. Honolulu will host the Hawaii Digital Government Summit this fall. Although these summits may or may not be indications that Maui is developing as a major smart city, technology is becoming so integrated into our ways of life that it is only a matter of time until we are living under technologically-controlled cities that restrict our travel and modern conveniences.
At this time, it is difficult to know whether BlackRock and other investors intentionally created the fires for their own interests, or if the fires were started to bring about the rise of a smart city, and since there is much speculation surrounding the events, we can only guess and investigate. We do know that Opray Winfrey and Jeff Bezos were not affected by the fires, so at least the rich and powerful on Maui will be fine to continue living their luxurious lives, while the local people struggle to survive and keep their land. Perhaps these affluent part time residents can buy up the land from the lower classes, along with the plethora of other investors.
Could the fires have been started by something even more sinister than a power company’s negligence? Although some online commentators have been pointing to directed-energy weapons, it appears that some of the images of “lasers” beaming down were fabricated or showed phenomena in other locations. We have no proof (at this time) that this or weather modification was responsible for the fires, but the technology does exist for this to have happened.
As I pointed out in my piece on the Canada wildfires, the government has been involved with weather manipulation and has planned to use the weather as a weapon, and such examples include: a 1970 Department of Agriculture report called “Forest Fire as a Military Weapon,” Lockheed Martin’s partnership with the Department of Defense (DoD) and Office of Naval Research (ONR) to develop laser-weapon technology, the DoD’s work with the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) and Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) to develop directed-energy weapon (DEW) research programs, hurricane modification in a program called Project STORMFURY, monsoon modification during the Vietnam War in a program called Project (or Operation) Popeye, and artificial creation of rain or snow through cloud seeding programs (this is done by governments in several countries and states).
How anyone can just blindly believe that climate change is the result of human activity by the common man or businesses, when governments admit that they are manipulating the weather, gets into the question of how people get sucked into cults. The so-called experts may just be observing government-created weather events that are then used as proof of manmade climate change.
Either way, if governments wanted to create catastrophes to implement certain policies or agendas, some of the aforementioned technologies and plans would work well, being that there would never be any evidence of government manipulation left behind (until many years later when reports were released and nobody cared anymore). With that being said, I think we cannot rule out that weather manipulation was in play for the Maui fires (again, we do not know for sure). We need to be vigilant, because weaponized weather events can also occur in other places under the guise of climate change (like Washington state or British Columbia?).
While the Biden administration continues to gather up billions and billions of dollars to send to Ukraine to extend a de facto war against Russia, the people of Maui (actual American citizens) have received very little from the federal government, thus showing where the priorities of elites and politicians lie. The government, through the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), has set aside $5.6 million to send out $700 per household to those in Maui devastated by the loss of their homes. Although he has said that he will commit more aid in time, it appears that President Joe Biden is more concerned for the people of Ukraine than he is for his own fellow citizens in Hawaii (he finally decided to leave his vacation in Delaware and visit the island thirteen days after the disaster). This should not be surprising for anyone who is not naïve about how government works and how agendas outweigh what is best for the people.
At the time of this writing, 115 people in Maui have been confirmed dead, with up to 850 (or more) still unaccounted for. If we can prove that governments or corporations were involved in intentionally or recklessly scorching parts of Maui to take advantage of the aftermath, we need to hold them accountable and ensure that the entities responsible cease to exist.
Thank you for reading, and please check out my book, The Global Bully, and website.
Thanks for reading Craig’s Newsletter! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.