This year marks the twenty-fifth anniversary of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, and even after all of this time, the population largely still goes along with the official narrative that nineteen amateur pilot hijackers, mostly from Saudi Arabia, were able to infiltrate and evade the most powerful nation’s intelligence and military forces to kill almost 3,000 Americans in an event that gave the federal government the excuse to centralize power and install a surveillance state and wage war in any country around the world for any reason. It may take a rocket scientist to understand the trajectory of the aircraft or an engineer to comprehend how buildings that were specifically designed to withstand hits from planes fell in what looked like a controlled demolition, but it only takes an inquisitive mind that is free from the constant conditioning of the corporate media, academia, and government to ask questions and come to the conclusion that the events of that day could not actually have been a perfect storm of coincidences that all just happened to benefit those in charge and harm the masses.
For many Americans reading this, it may seem like an inconceivable concept that elements from within their own government partnered with foreign forces to murder its own citizens. However, one must consider that false flag attacks are not as uncommon as one might think. In fact, if you boil down what happened on October 7th, 2023 with the Israeli government seemingly allowing Hamas to attack that country in order to gain justification to bomb Gaza, Syria, Yemen, Iran, and Lebanon, you start to see a pattern of governments doing this to push their sick and twisted agendas. Additionally, with the 1962 Operation Northwoods that was concocted by the Department of Defense (DoD) and the Joint Chiefs of Staff, it is pretty difficult to deny the intentions of our leaders. Although President John F. Kennedy, who was assassinated some time afterwards, shot down the operation; the fact that top government agencies wanted the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) to switch out planes with drones and let radio stations broadcast that terrorist attacks had occurred, fake hijackings of naval vessels, sink civilian boats of refugees, destroy civilian ships, blow up parts of military installations, and stage riots is pretty telling. Yes, elements within the government were willing to sacrifice Americans’ lives and deceive the public on a mass scale for the opportunity to wage a war with Cuba. As someone who had a secret clearance in the United States Air Force, I can attest to the fact that these operations would have been compartmentalized, and therefore, with participants not understanding the full picture or the overall concept of what they were doing (just simply performing their minute task of the day), false flag events are able to be carried out without suspicion of those assisting.
Plans for invading Afghanistan and waging a worldwide war against al-Qaeda were orchestrated in mid-July of 2001, and President George W. Bush was expected to sign the war effort into official plans on September 9, 2001. Lucky for him, two days later, Osama bin Laden supposedly gave him the justification that he needed to wage the war, almost as if he had foresight that the attacks were going to occur and was waiting for the right moment to announce it to the public. But, admittedly, one coincidence of war plans and showing that the government would have intent to commit atrocities against the population are not proof of a 9-11 inside job, so let us continue.
In the months leading up to the 9-11 attacks, whistleblower Indira Singh claimed that PTech software, which was funded by Saudi Arabia (where were the hijackers from again?), was utilized by several United States departments and agencies (including the DoD, FBI, House of Representatives, Secret Service, Department of Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, and Federal Aviation Administration, or FAA), and this allowed al-Qaeda operatives to gain access to top-level security protocols and infiltrate systems (including flight information at the FAA), while the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) actively (it was alerted) looked the other way and allowed it to happen (perhaps at the direction of upper channels or the CIA). PTech was then supposedly used as a platform for funneling money between the CIA, Pakistani Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), the Saudi government, and al-Qaeda members. It is also possible that because Israeli operatives, known as the “Dancing Israelis,” were celebrating the destruction of the Twin Towers, the Israeli government may have been involved as well, or at least known about it and not warned American officials. Therefore, it is very likely that the CIA was still using bin Laden as an asset, despite having allegedly broken ties after the Cold War.
Speaking of moving money around, the head of Pakistan’s ISI, Mahmoud Ahmed, who was coincidentally in Washington, D.C. on September 11 and had meetings with CIA Director George Tenet and officials at the DoD and White House prior to the event, ordered Omar Sheikh to wire $100,000 to lead hijacker Mohammad Atta (neither Ahmed nor Sheikh were ever brought up on charges). Additionally, the CIA is alleged to have pressured Saudi Arabia, which has long been accused of funding al-Qaeda, to issue passports to some of the hijackers (allowing them entry to the United States), and after the CIA was tracking two of the individuals from Saudi Arabia into the United States (showing no intent of actually stopping the plot), the agency intentionally withheld the information from the FBI.
Thanks to the Guantanamo Military Commission, we also now know that Nawaf al-Hazmi and Khalid al-Mihdhar (two of the hijackers) were absolutely greenlit by the CIA for entry into the United States and were almost certainly acting as operatives on the agency’s behalf (the CIA allegedly had Saudi Arabia recruit these individuals). Saudi national and intelligence operative Omar al-Bayoumi helped to establish them in the United States as well, so even though the hijackers may not have been wittingly working for the CIA, Bayoumi was feeding information to the CIA’s Alec Station (and the CIA was illegally conducting espionage in the United States by going through Saudi Arabia to avoid legal consequences). There was no intelligence failing for the attacks. It was orchestrated the way that it was to allow the events to occur, and Saudi Arabia and Pakistan were heavily involved.
It does not end there, however. The FBI was alerted to the hijackers before they did their deeds, as some of them were training in flight schools in the United States to become pilots (one of the hijackers, Zacarias Moussaoui, raised a red flag to an instructor after being interested solely in flying rather than actually understanding all aspects of flight, such as landing).
On the financial front, there was an increase in investors purchasing put options for United Airlines and American Airlines (the airlines that hosted the hijacked planes), as well as insurance stocks in the days leading to the 9-11 attacks, and as soon as the event occurred, these people made huge profits on the shorted stocks as if they had insider knowledge into what would transpire. Likewise, European banks were investigating whether investors shorted stocks in airlines, insurance, gold, and silver to manipulate the market for their own gain, indicating that this was a global phenomenon where people may have had advanced knowledge that something was about to happen (there is speculation that Islamic terrorists bet against the stocks of the airlines because they had had a hand in planning the attacks).
Furthermore, the leaseholder of the World Trade Center, Larry Silverstein, coincidentally added terrorism insurance to the new lease in June 2021 and had a doctor’s appointment on the morning of September 11 that he decided to go to instead of dying in the blazes (President Donald Trump’s current secretary of commerce, Howard Lutnik, who was also associated with Jeffrey Epstein, conveniently avoided routine that one day by bringing his child to school and not going to work on time to avoid certain death). In the end, Silverstein was initially awarded $3.5 billion in insurance payouts, but after arguing that two buildings were targeted, he attempted to get double but settled on $4.55 billion.
After BBC (and CNN) reported that Building 7 had already collapsed almost a half hour before it did (claiming that it received bad information from Reuters), Silverstein was also quoted as saying that they needed to “pull” the building (was he worried about a potential asbestos claim or costly repair and wanted the towers gone?), indicating that he knew that it was going to collapse (he later clarified that he meant the firefighters should be pulled to avoid loss of life, but that is a peculiar way to say it). Was this foresight into Building 7, which just funny enough housed a secret CIA office inside of it that conveniently had its records destroyed, a coincidence that can be explained away, or is there something more to it? Oh, and by the way, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld had announced on September 10 that the DoD could not “track” $2.3 trillion in transactions, and then, the Pentagon was hit the next day with no need to search through destroyed records (the public was too distracted to care about their missing taxpayer dollars).
When President Bush and National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice claimed that the government could not have known that terrorists would hijack planes and use them as weapons to fly into buildings, they were either lying or they were not aware of what their own government (that they supposedly controlled or were a large part of) was doing. Either way, North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) was conducting exercises, in conjunction with DoD (Fertile Rice and Vigilant Guardian). These exercises even happened right up to the point of September 11, causing military members involved in training to ask, “Is this real-world or exercise?.” Did government officials know that the same thing they were having their military members practice was going to happen simultaneously to cause chaos and confusion and a lack of response on the day when it really mattered? Why were military jets not dispatched to protect our skies and down any further threats? It is almost like the government played incompetent in order to let the attacks occur (or al-Qaeda, with its CIA-granted access to government systems, knew that exercises would occur on that day and planned accordingly).
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth) has assembled 2,936 experts to raise awareness on CSPAN and across multiple platforms on the importance of investigating the truth of the 9-11 attacks. They are not convinced by the official narrative that buildings that were designed to withstand hits from aircraft would fall in a manner that appeared to look like a controlled demolition. In their opinion, heat alone could not cause steel beams and columns to fall, nor could debris from the Twin Towers have flown over to the right spot in Building 7 to cause a fire there that then collapsed that building. Even if fires erupted, the sprinkler systems should have prevented widespread blazes, and yet, those happened to malfunction on this one day in all three of the buildings too? AE911Truth concludes that thermite explosions are the only logical explanation, and even firefighters on the ground testified that they heard what sounded like explosions.
Then, of course, you have the indestructible passports of the hijackers that were conveniently found around the area instead of burned up in the rubble. The passports of Satam al Suqami, Saeed al Ghamdi, and Ziad Jarrah were found on the ground near where the attacks occurred (Abdulaziz al Omari’s passport was left in the airport, and Mohammed Atta’s was found later on in Pakistan, indicating that it was not on his person during the crash, or he did not really pilot the craft). So, let me get this straight. Excessive heat melted the steel in the buildings, but it could not touch the paper that made up the passports? I guess the government really does think that the public is stupid (most have fallen for the story for years). Clearly, the passports were staged, and there is very little that can be said that would suggest otherwise.
Even after the invasion of Afghanistan began, the Bush administration was not interested in proving that al-Qaeda was responsible for the attacks. In fact, the Taliban, which was the effective government of that country, had nothing to do with the attacks, so the fact that the United States attempted to topple the government was a clear indication that al-Qaeda was not the primary motivating factor for the war (recall that an invasion to remove the Taliban had already been in the works prior to the attacks). Before the invasion, the Taliban offered to try bin Laden for crimes in an Islamic court in Afghanistan, and of course, that proposal was rejected. After the bombing began, the regime then negotiated and asked the United States for proof that bin Laden had orchestrated the attacks and proposed sending him over to a neutral country to be tried there, but President Bush’s response was: “There’s no need to discuss innocence or guilt. We know he’s guilty.” Someone who thinks outside of the box could argue that lack of producing proof on the part of the government could indicate that there is no proof at all. Perhaps bin Laden was not really involved in the 9-11 attacks, or if he was, perhaps he participated in a partnership with the CIA. Would showing proof of bin Laden’s guilt have revealed information to the public that the government wanted to keep secret? Why did it take the United States government and its sophisticated intelligence network ten years to locate a man who had been hiding in a compound in public view of satellites in Pakistan? Could it be that the government did not want to locate him because he was an ally, and when he finally passed away, a staged operation ensued that led to the dumping of his body in the ocean where nobody could find it?
The 9-11 attacks led to twenty-five years of wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, and Libya, with additional counterterrorism operations in Pakistan, Turkey, Niger, Nigeria, Algeria, Mauritania, Mali, Kazakhstan, Indonesia, the Philippines, Brazil, Argentina, Colombia, and several other countries (seventy-eight in total). Hundreds of thousands of civilians were killed (millions of people including everything), and trillions of dollars were spent to bolster corporate profits at the expense of American taxpayers. Roughly $7 trillion went directly to defense contractors, including Lockheed Martin, Lloyd Austin’s (secretary of defense under President Joe Biden) Raytheon, and Dick Cheney’s (Vice President under President Bush) Haliburton; and Facebook, Twitter, Google, Microsoft, and Amazon were awarded a collective $44.5 billion.
Furthermore, the aftermath of the attacks gave the excuse to set up a surveillance system that many had wanted to enact prior to 9-11 (legislation was ready to go awaiting the right incident to pass it). The National Security Agency (NSA) partnered with Big Tech companies to concoct the Planning Tool for Resource Integration, Synchronization, and Management (PRISM) program that was utilized to spy on Americans. The Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (USA PATRIOT Act) destroyed the Fourth Amendment and weakened Americans’ rights by allowing NSA and FBI agents to participate in “bulk collection of data, wiretapping, the bypassing of warrants for metadata and ‘inadvertent’ data sweeps from communication with foreigners, moving of warrants from strict judicial review to never-denied approval by secret courts (courts under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act), forced requests for third parties to reveal the data of their clients without their knowledge, monitoring of large sums of money, the ability for the government to initiate a search based on the content of book choices or online searches, and tapping of people’s telephone conversations within three hops of the original conversation with a foreigner (basically everyone).”
Everything that happened before, during, and after the 9-11 attacks benefited the rich and powerful. When you have that many coincidences favoring the elites of society at the expense of the populace, it is difficult not to think that the event itself was orchestrated at the top. As we remember the thousands of civilians, firefighters, and police officers who paid the ultimate price and had to sacrifice their lives for something so sinister, we should begin to rally around the common cause of learning the truth and preventing something like this from occurring again (in whatever form that looks like). It is a hard pill to swallow thinking that elements from within our own government could have participated in such atrocities, but it is better that you learn it now than to continue living in naivety (trusting the government). We have been conditioned to believe that our government is the good guy around the world and domestically (or at least not so evil), but anonymous former agents of the CIA and FBI have allegedly suggested that the modern United States government makes the Third Reich look like a “tea party” (see around the twenty-nine-minute mark). Do with this information what you will, but remember: if we do not stand up for ourselves or our rights, more incidents like this will occur.
Thank you for reading, and please check out my book, The Global Bully, and website.