The Clinton-Obama Russia Hoax Distraction from the Epstein Fiasco Reveals Some New Important Information
Over the past weekend, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Deputy Director Dan Bongino announced that he had information about corruption in government that “has shocked me down to my core” and implied that “We cannot run a Republic like this. I’ll never be the same after learning what I’ve learned.” What exactly Bongino was referring to is unknown, but it comes at a time when the Donald Trump administration is conducting damage control over the Jeffrey Epstein debacle (see my take here) and focusing on the potential distraction of the “Crossfire Hurricane” investigation to direct conservatives’ attention onto the corruption of the Democratic Party and away from the idea of the president’s name possibly being linked to Epstein’s “client list” (not just flight logs or guest lists or telephone directories).
Whatever incriminating evidence of pedophilia, corruption, money laundering, blackmailing, and intelligence operations were occurring by high-profile figures in American politics through Epstein’s “island,” the deep state did not want it released under the presidencies of Barack Obama or Joe Biden, so what would make one believe that it is actually going to happen under Donald Trump? We may get some teases and partial releases that reveal little nuggets of information, such as President Trump’s request for the Department of Justice (DoJ) to file for the courts to release the grand jury transcripts in the Epstein case (federal judges in Florida have already refused, and there is little hope that the judges in New York will give the people what they want) or Ghislaine Maxwell’s interview with the DoJ and upcoming deposition in front of Congress on August 11, but does anyone actually think that bombshell information that has been intentionally hidden from public view for years will see the light of day? The corruption runs very deep, and unless it is revealed that President Trump and his cronies are playing some kind of 4D chess that is impossible for the average American to comprehend, it is pretty safe to say that at the very least, the president is covering up for crimes committed by elites that ran in the same social circles that he did.
As the fallout over this fiasco occurs, Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard, who was once targeted by the very intelligence community that she now heads, has attempted to release information pertaining to corruption committed by the Barack Obama administration to distract right-wing pundits and conspiracy theorists away from the Epstein issue. Although, as I wrote about two years ago, the Hillary Clinton campaign conspired with the Democratic Party to create the Steele dossier and the hoax that Donald Trump collaborated with Russia to win the 2016 presidential election, and they got the FBI to open up, without any evidence of wrongdoing, the “Crossfire Hurricane” investigation, thus showing that the FBI was involved in the plot to take down Trump; the timing of Gabbard’s investigation is suspicious. Would this new evidence of the Obama administration committing “treasonous conspiracy” have been brought to light if Trump was not facing a political scandal surrounding the coverup of Jeffrey Epstein’s former associates? Still, even if this is just a distraction, there is damning evidence that the American people need to be informed about.
The new documents that Gabbard declassified revealed that Russia was not attempting to influence the results of the 2016 election through cyber hacking (just likely to cause distrust in the American election process) and that according to a Vladimir Putin confidant, “he [Putin] did not care who won the election.” Of course, Hillary Clinton made up the entire narrative of connecting Russian hackers with the Trump campaign in order to divert public attention away from her email scandal (she was personally liable to pay a fine of $8,000 for misreporting campaign finances, which is what Trump got a criminal conviction for, and the Democratic National Committee’s civil punishment was $105,000), and now, apparently, the Obama administration jumped in on the fun to weaken Trump’s chances of winning and undermine his entire first term.
It started with former DNI James Clapper, Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Director John Brennan, National Security Advisor Susan Rice, Secretary of State John Kerry, Attorney General Loretta Lynch, and Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe discussing the threat that Russia may pose to the upcoming election and creating an intelligence community assessment (ICA), in conjunction with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), National Security Agency (NSA), CIA, and FBI, to determine how Russia may have interfered; and it evolved into President Obama releasing “leaked false statements to media outlets” in order to convince the public that “Russia has attempted through cyber means to interfere in, if not actively influence, the outcome of an election.” Additionally, it has been determined that the ICA was “politicized” and intentionally left out information showing that Putin was not interested in the election outcome and had no motivation or ability to interfere with it.
Furthermore, even though we already knew that the FBI was involved in the conspiracy to undermine Trump, new information has shown that the CIA was also involved, even advocating for the Steele dossier to be included in the ICA knowing that it was not based on any credible information (rumors only). CIA analysts were even the brains behind the ICA, which was based on false, biased, and implausible claims and inadequate evidence that Russia wanted Trump to win over Clinton, and this was done to cause inconsistencies and expedite the ICA so that it could never be properly verified. Simply put, the CIA and co-conspirators wanted the false information to be released to the public quickly and without any challenges in order to undermine the incoming Trump administration. It is now clear that this effort was pushed through by President Obama himself.
It appears that deep state actors were so worried that Trump was a wildcard and would not push their interests that they attempted to undermine him every step of the way, and it makes you wonder why, despite these attempted coups and political manipulations, the current president still caves to the will of the elites. What blackmail tactics are going on that he still feels subservient to their power and cannot release the Epstein Files or resist efforts to end the wars in Ukraine and those pertaining to Israel? Or, maybe this was all just theater and President Trump never had the interests of the American people at heart. After all, he insists that because of the Supreme Court’s ruling, President Obama will have “immunity” from prosecution for official acts committed during the term of the presidency, and is this a signal that the DoJ is not going to make any arrests around this bombshell report? Does this prove that Gabbard’s investigation was indeed just a distraction and that, ultimately, Trump and Obama are both part of the same elitist club where they pretend to hate one another but really protect the deep state agendas?
Thank you for reading, and please check out my book, The Global Bully, and website.