By the Star-Spangled Banner, Was Baltimore’s Francis Scott Key Bridge Collapse a Chain of Coincidences or Something Else?

To coincide with Sean Combs’ (Diddy, P. Diddy, or Puff Daddy) attempt to flee the country to escape sexual abuse charges or to spill the beans on a larger child-trafficking scheme (who knows at this point), the Francis Scott Key Bridge over the Patapsco River in Baltimore, Maryland collapsed on March 26, 2024 under mysterious circumstances after having one of its central columns rammed by a runaway cargo ship, the Dali. Of course, right off the bat, President Joe Biden announced that there was no terrorism involved against the Sri Lanka-bound vessel, which was carrying 1,400 containers, and that the federal government would likely pay for the bridge’s reconstruction in its entirety (after freeing up $60 million initially to assist with cleaning debris from the harbor). Where was this sense of urgency and ability to help the people of East Palestine, Ohio or Lahaina, Hawaii after those locations’ respective disasters? He was reluctant to even visit those places, but he had no problem freeing up his schedule to visit a city that has an important port.

Is there a coverup going on in Baltimore? The Singaporean-flagged but Grace Ocean Private Ltd.-owned ship, which was managed by Synergy Marine Group and chartered by Maersk, surely had “Protection and Indemnity” (P&I) and other types of insurance that could pay for the replacement of the bridge that their ship destroyed. But no, the federal government will gladly allow the insurance companies to keep the profits and not have to waste their own resources conducting an investigation and paying out the cost of the construction fees (will people like Larry Silverstein, who took out terrorism insurance right before the World Trade Center buildings fell and profited from the disaster, benefit from insurance payouts?). Do not worry about killing six construction workers, who were filling potholes at the time, halting economic activity for the city, preventing the 35,000 daily trips across the bridge that the local population relies upon, losing up to 15,000 jobs related to the shipping industry, and diverting agricultural goods, steel, aluminum, and automotive products (upwards of 750,000 automobiles per year). Instead, we will force the taxpayers to foot the bill and make struggling families in this high-cost economy continue to do without their wants and necessities. We are all in this together, after all, like one happy communist family, and the corporations can escape accountability and continue to make their profits at the citizens’ expense. Yay for the not-so-free market and crony (false) capitalism.

Officials were quick to react to this event by dismissing the idea that the ship’s computer systems were hacked (claiming that it was due to a mechanical and engine failure instead), causing the ship to be deliberately maneuvered into the bridge’s support beam. The question then becomes: of the eighteen bridge collapses involving cargo ships in the United States since 1960, why is this one headline news that requires an immediate response from the federal government? How did they know so quickly that it was not terrorism before an investigation was actually done? Could it be that this incident would be embarrassing for President Biden and show the weakness of the federal government if something sinister were afloat, and by covering it up, people will soon forget about the tragedy and still vote blue this November? Since the incident is being played off as a simple accident, the president can come in and save the day with federal funds and convince the public that he is much better than the other candidate (plus, if Republicans refuse to pay for the bridge, the negative publicity can cause the Democratic Party to seem like the better alternative).

Although we do not know the cause of what looks eerily similar to the potential predictive programing contained in the Barack Obama-Netflix film Leave the World Behind, we know that it was definitely not a cyberattack or terrorism, of course (does this remind you of: we do not know how COVID-19 came into existence, but we know it was definitely natural and not formed in a laboratory; or, we have not done an investigation yet, but we know for a fact that Osama bin Laden knocked down those towers). However, journalist Lara Logan insists that the reason that we see the lights on the ship flicker off and then come back on is that someone took control of the ship and steered it directly toward the support beam (the ship appears to have been outside of the path to hit the bridge but then inexplicably makes a suspicious hard turn toward it), and although it is unsubstantiated at this time, she claimed that the federal intelligence agencies (and the Department of Homeland Security) knew that this attack on our infrastructure was a strategic cyberattack to cause supply chain issues (again, this is her claim, and we do not yet know exactly what happened).

If this were an act of terrorism, who would be responsible? Israeli-American startup company Cybereason and the World Economic Forum (the organization that predicted and trained on viral-spread exercises immediately before the COVID-19 pandemic) have been practicing cyberattack simulations for scenarios ranging from crippling our infrastructure to preventing people from casting their ballots to foreign actors rigging our elections, and since 2024 is a presidential election year, we should expect this to be when such cyberattacks transpire, if they are to occur. The powers that be and the deep state bureaucratic oligarchs really do not want Donald Trump to assume the presidency, and they will do anything to sabotage his campaign and prevent him from revealing the truth about what the United States government is doing. They started with weaponizing the legal system, attempting to save democracy by taking away the people’s choices on the ballot (oh, the irony), and planting fake news in the corporate media (remember the “bloodbath” comment taken out of context by every major news outlet?), and if that fails, the intelligence agencies and rogue elements within our government will likely resort to other means to rig the election. Perhaps this Baltimore bridge incident is one of them.

Others point to the Ukrainian or Israeli governments as the culprits, since financial support to Volodymyr Zelensky and enthusiasm for the continued genocide and bombing campaign against Gaza seem to be drying up. Although these are possible hypotheses, we do not have enough evidence (at least yet) to draw such conclusions. However, one interesting idea is that the United States government’s warning to Russia about the ISIS(-K) attack at a Moscow theater was actually more than the Biden administration being nice and fulfilling its duty to inform other nations of upcoming terrorist attacks. Perhaps the Biden administration (with assistance from British intelligence and Ukrainian agents) directed and coordinated with ISIS to murder Russians in cold blood, as Russian Federal Security Service (FSB) head Alexander Bortnikov claimed, and the Baltimore bridge incident was covert retaliation by Vladimir Putin to hack the ship and destroy a key piece of American infrastructure. Are we looking at the result of a tit-for-tat covert war between Russia and the United States, and neither government wants to admit publicly that it is happening? We do not know, but we can speculate.

Could the potential false flag attack go even further and include explosions on parts of the bridge that caused the steel beams to tumble into the harbor like a bunch of toothpicks poorly constructed together? Of course, the fact checkers would argue that that is an absolute impossibility, and maybe it is, but should we not at least investigate and find out and acquire any evidence available before dismissing such claims (of course, we should only trust Snopes, Reuters, The New York Times, The Washington Post, Associated Press, and all of the other outlets that are owned and controlled by BlackRock and Vanguard and that push the exact same narratives)?

Not long after, in Oklahoma, a barge struck a bridge spanning the Arkansas River (why are there so many bridges being hit?), and the structure was reopened just days later without any significant damage (or media coverage). Yet, an expressway bridge carrying Interstate 695 (Baltimore Beltway) was able to be levelled to the ground with little effort. Not to mention, the Francis Scott Key Bridge was hit by another cargo ship (Blue Nagoya) in 1980 and was not toppled (the 95,000-ton weight of the Dali and the lack of concrete barriers this time around were blamed for the differences between the incidents).

Although some people appear to have been falsely posting about 2022 explosions on the Kerch Strait Bridge between Ukraine and Russia-claimed Crimea, some demolition experts would point out that there were indeed flashes of light and what appears to be flames on the actual trusses of the Francis Scott Key Bridge, which would indicate a deliberate sabotage with dynamite or thermite explosions. However, others would suggest that the flames and flashes were caused by electrical cables, which were there to power the lighting system, failing and sparking at the moment that the bridge was hit (we cannot really know at this time).

Another indication that this incident in Baltimore may have been deliberate is that according to federal and international maritime law, the Dali would have had two (or redundant) auxiliar power steering systems in place to prevent exactly what took place. When the ship lost power and one system failed, seconds later, the other should have kicked in and allowed the crew to manually steer with the emergency gear. Why, then, did the ship seemingly take a sharp turn toward the support when it appeared to have been on course to make it under the bridge without impact? It is possible that the ship may have been unable to maneuver with limited space and time and that the high speed may have prevented the anchors from working effectively (the anchors went to the port side, though the ship continued moving toward the beam), and some will argue that the ship simply lost control, but did it?

Explanations for the convenient loss of power that occurred at just the right time to cause the ship to be unable to maneuver properly include: total loss of the generator, bad fuel, and known mechanical issues that were never resolved (a faulty fuel pressure gauge was detected in San Antonio, Chile, and the ship was damaged in Antwerp, Belgium in 2016 after scraping a pier). However, the vessel somehow passed inspections in the United States in 2023 and did not raise any red flags.

It is being reported that the ship had a “complete blackout” and that the captain could not have done anything differently to avoid catastrophe, and although the engine and electrical power loss for one minute and three seconds may have been unavoidable in that moment, why were precautions not taken? If the ship was known to have issues (hitting a pier in Belgium is nothing to dismiss lightly), why were tugboats not escorting the ship completely out of the harbor? Although “extended tugboat escorts” are not required, perhaps given this ship’s history, it would have been prudent to have requested such a procedure (the crew did call for tugboats after it was too late).

Additionally, we have recently found out that the black box video recording between 01:24 and 01:26 am were conveniently missing, and if we did have the footage of that time, what would it reveal about what was occurring? 01:24 am was when alarms began sounding and distress calls went out, but the sensor data “ceased recording” until 01:26 am. Although some will say that this is normal because all recordings are dismantled during a complete power failure, except for the bridge audio, we have to wonder why data covering crucial moments always seem to be missing whenever a large disaster like this happens and a culprit or cause would have otherwise been able to be identified. 

Just like with East Palestine, hazardous materials were spilled into the Baltimore Harbor from this incident, and yet, the government wants to limit the people’s carbon footprint and pollution instead. Why are these government-allied corporations able to get away with environmental destruction without much accountability (maybe a slap on the wrist or two), but we have to alter our daily lives to save the planet? At a time when food processing plants are mysteriously burning, Boeing planes are falling apart in the skies, our infrastructure is crumbling (it has not improved under Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg), and prices are increasing faster than our wages (yet, the Biden supporters are claiming that we are in good economic shape, because of statistics), we must question whether the powers that be would want to sabotage our way of life and destroy our country for the purposes of power and profit.

Maybe the Baltimore bridge incident was a total accident, and everything mentioned was just a chain of coincidences, but how many events do we need to experience with our own eyes and ears before we start to consider that perhaps there are sinister forces manipulating us in ways that we cannot fully understand? A good rule of thumb to know if an event was part of an ominous plot is to look at the following: did the event make national news, and if so, did it get enough attention to where everyone is talking about it? If the answer is yes, it was probably a planned event. If an occurrence was an accident, it would likely just be talked about locally or breezed over in a news article that most people would ignore (the Oklahoma bridge was struck around the same time as the Baltimore one, but it did not get near the same level of attention). Intentional events are used to push agendas, and therefore, propaganda surrounding them must be circulated around the country to invoke fear and a willingness to give up liberties, money, and livelihoods for the cause of the elites.

Thank you for reading, and please check out my book, The Global Bully, and website.